55. Is French Republicanism a Religion?
Dearly Beloved,
In a French village where we sometimes stay, there is a space by
the road which has been graced by the name of La Place de la Laïcité. The
nearest translation of la laïcité would be “secularism” but there is no
equivalent in English of this peculiarly French idea. The mayor of the commune
was very pleased to have a naming ceremony in which locals and other mayors were
gathered. His village would henceforth have two squares, The other being La
Place de L'Eglise (Church square) which was up the hill, below the mediaeval
castle.
The Mayor's father had been a socialist refugee from Franco's Spain. The
Mayor's name was Germinal, both the month of spring and germination in the
French revolutionary calendar but also the title of a famous novel by Émile Zola
on industrial strife. Germinal is proud of the French tradition of separating
religion from government, a celebration of Republicanism which started with the
French revolution (1789-1799) when the French state cut its links with
Catholicism and the Vatican, persecuted the clergy and decided it would
henceforth ensure that religion be totally removed from the political space so
that freedom of thought and reason might replace it. Today religion may not be
taught in schools in France.
The French President M. Macron, an admirable
president in may ways, has become mired in the bog of la laïcité. That is
because laws enacted in pursuit of la laïcité prohibits those working for the
government from wearing clothes, jewelry or symbols associated with religion.
That affects a large number of people because the civil service in France is
huge; it includes school teachers, university staff as well as civil servants
and a range of functionaries working in ministries and local government, staff
at the post office and railway workers. That means Muslims cannot wear Islamic
dress whilst at work for the French state.
The underlying problem, it seems to
me, is that those who thought up the idea in the late 18th century and
re-enforced it with laws in 1905, failed to realise that la laïcité has some
resemblance to religion itself. Although it does not involve the supernatural or
belief in a God, it does resemble religion in the way it determines how people
behave and conduct their everyday lives, including how people dress and present
themselves. Furthermore both Republicanism and religion are pursued with
enthusiasm by their adherents. France has suffered terrorism perpetrated by
Islamic extremists and President Macron now finds himself in the difficult
position of trying to defend the French, the French State and its institutions
from extremism by promoting the concept of la laïcité in an attempt to make a
clear distinction between religion and the state and promoting the latter as the
ideal French identity.
The consequence is that President Macron is being accused
of attempting to suppress Islam by both those within and outwith the country and
some French Muslims claim that laws associated with la laïcité are a backdoor to
allow expression of prejudice against Muslims in a country that otherwise
forbids racist forms of expression. This conflict unfortunately builds on the
memories of the cruelties of the Algerian war and the unhealed divisions it
created in French society. That has created a general feeling of gloom amongst
the people of the French Republic.
Perhaps, counter-intuitively, countries where
Christianity is well integrated into the state seem better equipped to
understand the importance of religious identity and give support to those
pursuing other religions. Thus the British have not felt it necessary to impose
sumptuary laws or produce cartoons mocking others of different religious
dispositions. On the other hand, last week our government enacted laws
restricting freedom of movement from other countries so we are not free of
prejudices against “the other” and must be on our guard against such ideas
causing division in our society too.
Peace,
Paul.
Comments